Peter LaBarbera loves NAMBLA.

Peter LaBarbera loves NAMBLA.  He loves it because he can use it deceitfully to defame all gay males; he brings up the death of radical kook Harry Hay seven years after the fact, pulling up his own old article about Hay from 2002.  LaBarbera is a sensationalist pseudo-researcher focussing on gay men — now, why would one think that is?  … Psych 101 could probably provide the answer to that.

Even though the acronym makes queers cringe, the Peter makes it sound as though this pedophile organization, which barely exists today, is highly revered among all ‘the homosexuals’.  I don’t have to pepper this post with links to prove what I already know is reality, that gay men have nothing to do with NAMBLA.  It is a handful of goddamn pedophile freaks.  He also refers to Harry Hay as “the father of gay rights”.  Nowhere but in right-wing extreme inventions is this “title” even found.  Even Hay himself refused to be named the hero of the gay movement.  Good.  Cuz folks like me don’t want him.

The Wiki article on NAMBLA makes it pretty clear that nobody wants them, nobody supports them.  Also, I really couldn’t find anything about the so-called “Spirit of Stonewall Declaration” that The Peter writes about …

Wikipedia article: “Almost all gay rights groups are opposed to NAMBLA and contend that their reason for disavowing NAMBLA has always been their sharing of the general public’s disdain for pedophilia and child sexual abuse (as expressed in issues statements). These gay rights groups[who?] reject NAMBLA’s claims of an analogy between the campaign for gay and lesbian equality and the abolition of age-of-consent laws, and view NAMBLA’s rhetoric about “the sexual rights of youth” as a cover for its members’ “real agenda”.”

The only references I can find with my googling are the Peter’s articles, or CWA who links to the Peter’s article and one reference in the comments after a news story, but that’s pretty much all … and this SOS “declaration” that Peter says Harry Hay was “one of the signers” — I can’t find it anywhere but in Peter’s crap, or  CWA.  So what if Hay and his handful of pedos wrote some “declaration” (that I can’t even find) to make themselves feel included.  This link to Stonewall Memorial dot org does not mention NAMBLA.   This is the closest thing I’ve found to any kind of “declaration”.

This lying, hyperbolic dweeb, Peter LaBarbera presents his portrait of Harry Hay and NAMBLA as the shining stars on the “gay movement”.  Harry Hay was a freak; he was an off-the-wall radical of the 50’s and 60’s.  He’s dead.

Try googling NAMGLA, that’s right man-girl love.  Pedophiles are pedophiles, period.  Hell, let’s bring up the heterosexual  Age of sexual consent laws by state; shows how heterosexual men get their hands on the young’uns legally, as young as 14, of course Pappy has to consent, if he’s done with her.

Point being, two adult men in their 50’s or two adult women, etc. — WTF do they have to do with pedophilia?  That is mostly a HETERoSEXUAL fetish, as is well known.

Copied from this article on Religious Tolerance dot org called The Reality of Pedophilia:

The Reality of Pedophilia

We get often caught in a semantic conflict when discussing the sexual abuse and molestation of children. Depending upon our exact definitions of terms, it can be shown:

  1. that homosexual abuse of children is widespread, and
  2. that abuse of boys by gays is rare, and
  3. that the abuse of girls by lesbians is rarer still.

If we define the phrase “homosexual abuse of children” in the first statement to mean adults molesting and abusing children of the same sex, then this statement is true: Child sexual abuse is widespread. It is perpetrated by males in the vast majority of cases. And a substantial minority of their victims are boys. Data relating to men abusing boys is hungrily pounced upon by opponents to equal rights for homosexuals, who often use it against both gays and lesbians in civil rights battles. But it is not homosexuals, as the term is generally understood, who are responsible for the abuse. It is rather pedophiles who are attracted to children, and have decided to abuse them.

However, if we define the phrase “abuse of boys by gays”, and “abuse of girls by lesbians” to mean adult persons with a homosexual orientation abusing children of the same sex, then these statements 2 and 3 above are also true. Gays and lesbians rarely abuse children.

The fact behind these conflicting statements is that most pedophiles are not homosexuals! Or to put it another way, most homosexual molestation is not done by homosexuals.

Another article from psychology u c davis.dot.edu, Facts About Homosexuality and Child Molestation:

This post could go on and on, but the point is, it’s disingenuous jerks like LaBarbera who make their living spreading misinformation that just toasts me.

[MUCH more on this, later, in another post perhaps]

Advertisements

Leave a comment

Filed under News and Stuff

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s