Peter Vadala claims he was fired from Brookstone for his “christian” views. Those “views” included telling a co-worker he “hated people like that” and referring to the woman as a “deviant”. I really don’t think he should have been fired … the woman doesn’t work at his store, and they could have given him some good ole “diversity training” and told to keep his religion and politics out of the work place. Or, maybe he was just a crappy employee and this took the cake? Fox News does a really crappy interview with no opposing side — fair and balanced, for sure.
It reminded me of a chick I worked with (20+ years ago) who started talking about some friend of hers who “had to work next to a homosexual” (tone of disgust in her voice). She prattled on and on, til she said she just couldn’t understand why all gay men wanted to dress up in women’s clothes, “that’s just disgusting”. I whipped my head around and told little lady the startling news that she, too, was stuck working next to a gay person and that, No, I’ve never had any desire to put on women’s clothing. Her jaw dropped as she looked me up and down. We had quite an interesting talk, broke down all of her preconceived notions about gay people … told her that there were even people in her church who had some kind of gay feelings. It’s human nature. And, I’ve been to churches, lots of them. Of course, she balked at that, because everything in the theist’s world, every reality, every fact, has to be warped and folded to fit inside their tight little box. If I remember correctly, her little tight box was the FLDS.
The Brookstone woman with the “so-called” fianceé might be an obnoxious person, I don’t know, but nevertheless she was excited about her upcoming wedding JUST LIKE ANY HETEROSEXUAL would be. Fine, if she’s a “deviant”, then anyone should have the right to call him a deluded, self-important, whiney little sad sack … that pretty much sums up the sentiments of most YouTuber comments … except for two YouTubers, one of whom actually accused others of “ad hominem personal attacks” (for observing that he was being hateful) while consistently hurling out his own filthy personal attacks, and exposing the true foundation of his views — not facts, but raw rage. The intelligence flows.
After being accused of hiding behind his keyboard anonymity, he makes the old lame threat of violence over the internet (sign of a total loser), then goes on to reveal his obvious fixation (his “Objectivists against Homosexuality” website he’s ‘busy working on’) and we know what Psych101 will tell you about that. He doth protest too much. And, he loves to quote Ayn Rand, who held strong personal beliefs concerning sexuality (which are not the view of most objectivists). Rand, besides being severely mentally ill, was extremely ignorant on the subject of human sexuality (homosexuality), and herself had extramarital affairs. Shame on hypocritical assholes like Ayn Rand — fuck immoral, dishonest and untrustworthy heterosexual whores (male or female) like her. (Just turning her own bile back towards her.) From the YouTube comments after the Vadala video:
summary: “… be a man!” cuz no homos ever do any “man’s jobs” and we paint our nails and hang out with fag hags in bars! Dumbfuck.
We homos scream like women, and if we’d only try tomatoes, we would turn straight.
Yes, Vadala did say he “hated people like that” …
Here’s the threats of comin’ to kick yer ass … LOSER. And, homos are trying to push goat-sex on everyone.
He really hates women — odd for an Ayn Rand admirer? Maybe not. She was a total whack job.
And, another gem: Not only do all homos act and dress like women, neither is it possible for any homo to have biological children:
Here we go — after all the ‘filthy fag’ remarks jettisoned at the fellow YT user, he accuses the other of “ad hominem attacks” … love the response, but he still doesn’t get it. And, he goes off with the stupid argument about bestiality. It’s pretty clear that someone has some issues:
He “hate[s] christians just as much as you fags” … “they [christians] are mostly closet fags anyway” … And, there’s the Ayn Rand shit … ‘cuz it’s well documented how *cough* sane she was:
His argument amounts to “[are you] A stupid fag or a dumb whore?”.
Hardy-har-har at that last line.